Friday, December 24, 2010

Disease threat with coconut imports

(December 24, 2010) Sri Lankan agro scientists point out that the import of coconut from India may affect local coconut cultivation with new diseases.

Dr. K.P. Premarathna of Agriculture Faculty of Peradeniya University said to media that diseases might spread with the coconut imported from India.

Sources said that the Kerala state from where coconuts are imported to Sri Lanka had a large number of communicable coconut diseases.

The coconut cultivations of the Southern Province of Sri Lanka has been affected by a dangerous disease and the Coconut Development Board has already banned taking parts of coconut tree from the province to other areas.

The agricultural scientists say that the authorities had to consider this issue as well prior to importing coconut to bring down the prices.



Monday, December 20, 2010

Islands of Kalpitiya to be leased; future of the fishermen in the balance

(December 20, 2010) Sri Lanka Tourist Board has initiated measures to lease 10 islands in Kalpitiya area in the island's northwestern coast in a bid to encourage new projects to develop tourism in the country.

Sources reveal that 11 parties have sent in applications to take on lease of the 10 islands in Kalpitiya.

The Chairman of the Tourist Board Dr. Nalaka Godahewa said to media that the applications have been received by the closing of the December 3rd deadline to submit proposals.

The applications have been forwarded to the cabinet for its recommendations said Dr. Godahewa adding that he expected cabinet approval for the lease of the islands by January, as reported by local media.

Government sources say the islands are to be leased for periods of 30 to 50 years.

However, the Chairman of the tourist Board further said to media that the islanders who have been there for generations would not be removed once the islands are given on lease.


A late decision to ban felling of coconut trees of Sri Lanka

(Deember 20, 2010) Sri Lanka Minister of Coconut Development and Peoplized Estate Development Jagath Pushpakumara says that the government has decided to ban felling of coconut trees.

With immediate efect under the decision, anyone who wishes to fell coconut trees will have to seek the permission of the Coconut Development Board.

The Minister stated at a press briefing held in Colombo that the relevent gazette notification is being printed now.

The government decision came as the price of coconut, an essential commodity of Sri Lankans rose drastically as a result of shortage of produce.

Coconut, once one of the three major export income earners of the country has become an import as a result of felling of coconut trees in mass scale and lotting of coconut cultivations for housing.


Farmer killer leptuspirosis takes over 100 lives in Sri Lanka

(December 20, 2010) The Epidemiology Unit of the Sri Lanka Ministry of Health says that 107 deaths were reported from Sri Lanka so far during this year due to leptuspirosis.

The number of leptuspirosis cases reported during this period is 4295.

The most of the patients are farmers who catch the disease when working in paddy fields from urine of the rats that carry leptuspirosis.

As Wikipedia says, Leptospirosis is a bacterial zoonotic disease caused by spirochaetes of the genus Leptospira that affects humans and a wide range of animals, including mammals, birds, amphibians, and reptiles.


Thursday, December 16, 2010

Coconut; once major export, now imported

(December 16, 2010) Sri Lanka government has decided to import cocnut to eradicate the shortage and the escalation of prices.

Sri Lanka Ministry of Consumer Affairs is now taking measures to import coconut, sources say.

The import is to be done by next week. The amounts of import is yet to be known.

The price of cocnut has risen sharply in Sri Lanka and a nut is sold atound Rs. 45 now. Coconut is a basic commodity of Sri Lankans that use the coconut juice in cooking curry.

Meanwhile, the Coconut Development Board has taken measures to purchase coconut from state tands and to sell them at fair price. Coconut Development Board trucks sell coconut at Rs. 30 per nut at selected places and one person is allowed to buy five nuts each.


Saturday, December 11, 2010

Rice price escalating; buffer stocks processed

(December 11, 2010) Sri Lanka government says that the cabinet has granted approval to release 70,000 metric tons of rice from the government paddy stores to the market during the upcoming festive season.

The aim of this measure is to prevent the escalation of the price of the Sri Lankans' major staple food.
Treasury will release Rs. 430 million for processing paddy.

The rice of these buffer stocks will be sold by the Corporative Wholesale Establishment and Cooperative Society department stores.


Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Mahaweli land to businessmen while young generation lack land for farming

(December 08, 2010) Sri Lanka Minister of Irrigation and Water Management Nimal Siripala de Silva said that the land of Sri Lanka's Mahaweli development zones would be offered to the local entrepreneurs as and incentive.

The Minister said to local radio channel Hiru FM that 50 acres each would be allocated to 250 selected local businessmen.

The land is to be allocated to the businessmen for agricultural, animal husbandry and industrial projects, said the Minister.

The farmers suspect that this can be a move to offer valuable farmlands to businessman close to the government while the young generations of the Mahaweli colonizers face a severe problem of scarcity of land for farming.


Friday, December 3, 2010

A national summit on paddy development held in Sri Lanka

(December 02, 2010) A national summit on paddy development was held on December 02 at the Plants and Genetic Resources Centre in Gannoruwa in Kandy district.

The conference was held under the patronage of Minister of Agriculture Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena. Experts in the cultivation sector and top officials are taking part at the event together with a number of foreign representatives.

The participants reportedly focussed on identifying high yield verities of paddy, launch of eco friendly cultivation and many other issues related to paddy cultivation during the conference.

Meanwhile, the department of agriculture says 1.05 million hectares of paddy lands have been cultivated this year.


Saturday, November 13, 2010

Restoration of GSP+ urgently needed to sustain EU apparel market

 


article_image
The European Union withdrew the GSP+ tariff concession granted to Sri Lanka under special privileges to economically vulnerable developing countries since 2005, on 15 th August, 2010 in relation to what was regarded as shortcomings in Sri Lanka record on implementation of 27 International Conventions which is an integral part of the trade benefit.

The last nail to the coffin seems to have been driven when Mr.Bernard Savage, EU Ambassador in Colombo has stated recently that the Government and the EU are not involved in fresh talks to revive the GSP plus trade benefits for the country. He has categorically stated that the government had not made any approach to resume negotiations on the issue and so the matter was now closed. (Source – The Island – 09th November 2010)

During the recent past, one of the most crucial trade concession Sri Lanka received was the granting of GSP+ status in the EU market, following the "Tsunami" of 26th, December, 2004. This provided duty-free access for 7200 items and the most beneficiary of the concession is the Apparel sector. Few countries provide such an attractive Import Duty concession except under a Free- Trade-Agreement. (FTA)

Garments industry was promoted as an engine of development in Sri Lanka. It certainly brings dollars.

This provision of duty free access to EUmarket is regarded as having facilitated substantial growth in the country’s exports and especially apparel, in the region since its implementation in year 2005.

Major impact

Apparel exports alone to the WU, climbed from US$997 million in 2004 - the year before Sri Lanka was granted GSP+ benefits- to US$ 1,647 million in 2009 an increase of 65.2 percent and thus EUbecame the top market for Sri Lanka’s apparels in 2009 replacing the United States who had been the top market since the inception of the apparel industry in early 1980’s.

Its export share which was 37.6% in 2004 also climbed to 52.9% in 2009. It is widely accepted that the withdrawal of GSP+ will have a major impact on the apparel industry. The fear is that the growing number of European buyers will find Sri Lanka’s apparel increasingly uncompetitive and shift their sourcing to rival producers.

The details of Sri Lanka’s Garment exports to the EU are as follows-

The above table also indicates that due to the EU- GSP+ concession, total apparel exports also gradually increased year after year, except for year 2009, where the entire global apparel industry was affected due to a world-wide economic recession.

During 2009-with Sri Lanka while enjoying EU-GSP+ concessions, was the 8th Leading exporter to EU Market. China topped with US$ 38,057 mn, followed by Turkey-US$ 9,967,mn, Bangladesh-US$ 7,126 mn, India-US$ 6,316 mn, Tunisia-US$ 3,185 mn, Morocco-US$ 2,813 mn, Vietnam- US$ 1,752 mn and Sri Lanka-US$ 1,687 mn and closely followed by Indonesia US$ 1,603 mn and Pakistan US$ 1,568 mn. Now with Sri Lanka not enjoying the GSP+ concession with effect from 15th August, 2010, Sri Lanka obviously will be at a disadvantage.

Further Pakistan which was behind Sri Lanka will probably receive the GSP+ in 2011 to 2013, will also be a threat to Sri Lanka. The above countries are the main competitors of Sri Lanka in the global apparel market.

(Source-World Trade Organization-WTO)

The country thus stands to lose millions of dollars worth of apparel exports to the 27 –nations EU market and the livelihood of thousands of apparel sector workers are at stake, as the withdrawal of the privileges is expected to affect large number of factories.

According to Industrialists, the loss of the GSP+ benefit will exert tight pressure of profit margin, for when the benefits are lost, sellers will have to bear the cost of additional tariff. Under the GSP+ concessions Sri Lankan goods entering the EU need to pay no duty; but now the privilege is lost and the standard GSP kicked in and thus Sri Lankan apparel became subject to concession of only 2-2.4% duty which is 20% of standard tariff averaging 10-12% as against zero duty which enjoyed prior to withdrawal of GSP+ in 15th, August, 2010.

Decline in Exports

Meanwhile, despite Sri Lanka enjoying the GSP+ privileges in the EU, Sri Lanka’s Apparel exports to EU market contracted by 8.4% during the first eight months of current year from the year ago level. The apparel exports to EU during Jan/August, 2010 was US$ 986 million as against US$ 1,077 million during same period 2009. The European Commission (EC) announcement of 15th February, 2010 of it’s intention to suspend the GSP+ concession granted to Sri Lanka with effect from 15 th August,2010 would have also have affected for above decline in exports.

The Chairman of the Joint Apparel Association Forum, Mr.Sukumaran has said recently that it is most likely that the apparel exports, which is Sri Lanka’s key industrial exports, would come down by 10-15 percent this year, reaching US$2.7-2.8 billion, as compared to last year.

(Source - Fibre2Fashion News Desk – India)

Further according to Mr.Rohan Masakorale Secretary General - Joint Apparel Association Forum around 250 factories may get affected due to this withdrawal.

Sri Lanka’s second largest apparel export market is United States. In this market also it is seen the exports are gradually declining. The details are as follows-

It is seen from the above table the apparel exports to USA has declined by from US$1,556 million in 2004 to US$ 1,297 million in 2009, which is a drop of 16.6 %.The share also has dropped to 41.6% in 2009 from 58.7% in 2004.

The apparel exports to USA market during first eight months of 2010 declined by 4.6% over the same period year ago. The exports during the period Jan/August, 2010 was US$833 million as against US$ 873 million during Jan/August, 2009.

The major global market for apparel imports right throughout are EU and USA. In 2009, EU (US$ 160 billion) and USA (US$ 72 billion) totaling US$232 billion and these two markets accounted for 73% of global total apparel imports.

Similarly Sri Lanka’s two major apparel export markets are EU (US$ 1,65 billion) and USA (US$1.3 billion) and both these markets accounted for 94.5% of total apparel exports in 2009.

Cheaper Sources

In today’s market place, it has become a norm to source clothing from countries with low costs. Furthermore the buyers are being forced to look for cheaper sources in order to satisfy consumers who are increasingly demanding, while competition in the retail level continue to get tougher. However, there is still a gap in the market for manufacturers based in Western Europe and the United States who produce goods in their own country for sale in the domestic market and for export.

Of course, production costs are usually much higher in developed countries. Indeed labor costs alone in Western Europe can be over many times as high as those in Asian countries, Nonetheless, manufacturing in developed countries bring in number of benefits. One benefit is flexibility in being able to offer smaller production runs and short delivery times. While distant suppliers may be cheaper, buyers often demand minimum quantities which can be economically not possible. Furthermore, the buyers are looking increasingly to source from factories which adhere to Corporate Social Responsibility –CSR programmes in general-and fair labor practices in particular. Our "Garments Without Guilt" is well known both locally and internationally as superior garments.

Future Looks Bleak

On the employment side-media reports quoted that the future looks bleak and fears of retrenchment are worrying the workers, but the figures can rise with the withdrawal.

Thus causing loss of job opportunities in the apparel industry it will also no doubt affect the inflow of foreign currency from export earnings. Sri Lanka has gained a reputation of exporting top brands to leading buyers in the world but will soon lose that status if we don’t regain the GSP +.

International Textile Manufacturing Federation-ITMF, at its annual meeting in Brazil expressed its concern about the soaring cotton prices and their negative implications for the international cotton textile value chain from fibre to retail. The ITMF stated that the textile industry all over the world is not in a position to absorb any longer cotton price increases of unprecedented dimensions recorded during the past months without risking its own existence.

(ITMF-Press Release-8th

Further in addition to above stated facts, increases in prices of cotton, freight cost, currency fluctuation and competition from other countries with GSP+ with all this taking place in the global apparel industry and with an additional payment of 9.6% to 12% duty on Sri Lankan products makes Sri Lanka extremely expensive compared to our competitors.

Any decline in apparel exports will also affect the Local Textile Industry as obviously requirements from apparel industry will be gradually reduced.

The EU Ambassador Mr. Bernard Savage’s recent statement that the government and the European Union (EU) are not involved in fresh talks to revive the GSP plus trade benefits for the country, no doubt comes as a fresh blow to a dying industry thus intensifying the shock.

The EU this year decided to suspend Sri Lanka’s preferential trade status over allegations of human rights violations.

The EU said that Sri Lanka had not demonstrated that it had taken the steps that would allow it to retain or regain the GSP+ status.

(Source – The Island – 09th November 2010)

Therefore taking above facts into consideration, if the GSP+ status is not restored in the near future, the Sri Lanka’s apparel industry which is the major foreign exchange earner of the country for many decades may have to face bad times with decline in exports and employment opportunities.

Therefore the outcome will not be good for the economy of the country and thus the Government and the EU should pursue its dialogue without any further delay and both arrive at a win-win situation and ensure the restoration of the GSP+ at the earliest. If not one could imagine what would befall our Garment industry and its workers.


Monday, November 1, 2010

Sri Lanka government relaxes import duty on potato and big onion

(November 01, 2010) Secretary of the Ministry of Cooperatives and Internal Trade Anura Siriwardhana announced that the government has relaxed the import duty for potato and big onion.

Accordingly, the import tax for potato has been reduced to Rs. 10 per kilo from Rs. 30 per kilo earlier.

The import tax for big onion has also been reduced from Rs. 25 kilo earlier to Rs. 10 per kilo.

The government says the import taxes were imposed to sustain prices during the prices during the harvesting period of the local potato and big onion farmers.

The measure curbed the influx of imported cheap potato and big onion in the local market.

However, the importers of these commodities say that the market prices will not go down since the prices of potato and big onion have gone up in India.


Saturday, October 23, 2010

Gannoruwa introduces new tomato variety

(October 23, 2010) Horticultural Crop Research and Development Institute, Gannoruwa, Sri Lanka announced the introduction of new tomato variety suitable for the island.

The new tomato variety was introduced under project thrust Tomato varietal development via mutation breeding, according to the website of the institute.

Senior Research Officer Ranjani Peiris said to media that the new tomato variety named as ‘Lanka Cherry’ is smaller in size and the weight of a fruit is around eight grams.

She said that one hectare of the cultivation of Lanka Cherry would give as much as 17 tons crop.
The harvest can be kept at normal temperature without rotting for 10 to 18 days.



Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Anomalies in distribution of subsidized fertilizer by government of Sri Lanka

(October 20, 2010) Movement for National Land and Agricultural Reforms (MONLAR) of Sri Lanka urges the government to rectify the administrative errors of distribution of fertilizer to the rice farmers under the government subsidy.

The government spends Rs. 28 billion per annum for the fertilizer subsidy of the rice farmers to supply fertilizer at 4% of the actual market price. However, the farmers point out that some of the farmer organizations that are responsible of distribution of fertilizer engage malpractices.

Farmers complain that the farmer organizations add high transport costs to the 50 kilogram fertilizer bag and sell them well over Rs. 50 to the government subsidized price of Rs. 350.

Another issue highlighted is the lack of proper method to measure small amounts less than 10 kilograms that should be given to farmers according to the size of the land of the farmers. The farmers allege that these amounts of fertilizer that is spared from the farmers add into a huge stock finally that is swindled by the unscrupulous officials.

The farmers charge that the officials of the Peasants Service Centers are also meddled with corrupt deals of the farmer organizations.



Monday, October 18, 2010

It’s time to allow the hungry to feed themselves and the rest of the World

(October 17, 2010) The world is commemorating the WFD ( Oct.16 ) this year in a state where the food situation in the world is precarious . The lessons we have to learn from the experiences in trying to feed the world are very important. This is not because of the successes but because of the failures. The world leaders have almost come to a situation in which they need to admit that their efforts so far in trying to solve world’s hunger has failed and they are not in a position to find effective solutions.

In the year 2000, the world leaders met and decided to set up the Millennium Development Goals ( MDGs), when they promised that they would reduce world’s hunger by half by year 2015. There were 840 million people then, who were going to bed hungry every day. They should then have realized that all these 840 million people would be dead when they reached this target. But they went ahead. Now the number of people who were hungry have not reduced although two thirds of the target period has elapsed, but it has increased to 1.2 billion. The discussions that were held at the world conference on Food Security convened by FAO to see what could be done by the year 2050, when the situation becomes much more serious, ended up in not working out any effective strategy.

So, the task of the people on food and on the Food Day should be to emphasize that the present leaders of the world are unable to find solutions to the problem of hunger. Some other strategy and some other agencies must undertake to find solutions to the problem of hunger. The world fails to solve hunger not because the world does not produce enough to feed all, not because the technical capacity to produce enough food is lacking. It is simply because food is produced not mainly to solve hunger but to make profits. The entire activity of food production, processing and marketing is largely dominated by big companies ( TNCs ) who are more concerned in making greater profits rather than feeding the hungry. Much of the land and other natural resources that are necessary to produce food are in the hands of big companies, they also have a strong control over seeds and inputs and also technologies utilized to produce food. The process of land grabbing by the rich has got more intensified.

The recent crisis of price increases of food was caused due to food being used for production of bio fuels, more meat production leading to much food being produced to feed animals rather than to feed people and also due to large migration into cities making the populations in the cities compared with rural areas reaching 50 : 50. Another factor that is affecting food production is global warming resulting in climate change leading to lower yields. If you examine each of these reasons they are due to food production being controlled by profit motivated producers. The reasons for failure of world leaders to find effective solutions are due to the fact that they do not want to change this situation of allowing the big profit makers to have control and ownership over food production, seeds,marketing and food producing resources of the world.

This situation can be changed only by taking over the task of feeding the hungry away from these profit making controllers into the hands of those who are genuinely interested in solving hunger. Who are they ? They are the hungry people of the world. How can they do it ? If they do not have the capital presently needed to produce food, they have to think of strategies that do not depend on financial capital. Can the world think of a strategy that does not depend on financial capital to produce its food ?

In solving this issue it is necessary to recognize that the type of agriculture that is prevalent today is very heavily input dependent. The ecological impacts of such external input dependent agriculture has been found to be drastic and very damaging. World scale studies that have been done recently such as the IAASTED ( International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development) completed in April 2008 showed that the present day prevalent agriculture, though capable of producing much food and much diversity of food has committed two serious mistakes in ignoring the social aspects of agriculture and also the environmental aspects of it. This was a very important research that was done by 400 prominent scientists, commissioned by world’s leading institutions, who studied this in a large number of countries, over a period of four years and it was finally accepted by nearly 60 countries of the world. There is an alternative approach advocated by very large farmers movements such as Via Campasena ( world peasants movement ) and very large movements of small and landless farmers such as MST in Brazil who are promoting small scale ecological agriculture by small farmers as a more effective way of solving the problem of hunger.

The major difference in this approach is to make use of nature’s advantages such as maximizing the use of sunlight, maximizing bio diversity, improving the soil fertility by preventing erosion, by maximizing the benefits of microbial activity by adopting techniques that maximize the presence of microbes in the soil and also utilizing methods of integrated pest management instead of chemical pest control, chemical weed control and use of chemical fertilizer etc. Utilizing mixed farming rather than monocropping is another technique. This approach is fast growing in many countries in spite of the massive propaganda by agribusiness TNCs to continue their previous techniques that only bring profits to the larger operators at the cost of making a lot of farmers poorer and also destroying their livelihoods while making more and more people hungry. Introductionn of genetic modifications etc. have been done not so much due to their effectiveness in sustainability of agriculture but for the possibilities of maximizing profits in the hands of big companies.

We have been able to contact some practices that are developed in India by people such as Mr. Subash Pallekar who has done many years of research in developing the technique that he describes as “ Zero Budget Natural Farming”. This strategy is now being adopted by around 4 million farmers in India.

It is a simple technique that utilizes the basic principle that farming is done free of charge by nature. The technique utilizes only a simple formula named “jeevamurtha” a mixture of deshi cow dung, cow urine, some sweetener such as juggery or coconut water and some powdered cereal and a handful of soil from the neighborhood that contains microbes that are present in the said environment. A similar mixture named beejamurtha is utilized to prepare seeds for germination. What is important is that this application requires no financial input and it utilizes natural farming totally. These mixtures require only two days of fermentation to be ready for application and the result are immediate.

On the whole what is important in feeding the hungry is to allow the people who are threatened with hunger to develop their own techniques of finding their food by going back to nature and benefits of natural farming. What is necessary is to remove the policy obstacles that are existing against this strategy. Already much has been achieved by way of techniques of natural farming. Sometimes these techniques are called organic farming, or ecological farming, it can also be named regenerative agriculture since the proper techniques of natural farming will also help in restoring the ability of nature to regenerate itself.

Restoring the capacity of nature to regenerate itself is a need for survival of all human beings and all other life forms. From this point of view, this restoration of agriculture back into its natural process of regenerating nature is an essential requirement to ensure survival. This is being highlighted in the other crises such as the crisis of climate change and global warming too. Therefore these tasks that should be achieved in our techniques and policies of food production needs to be highlighted on the World Food Day. Any approach that restores the capacity of nature to regenerate itself has the moral right to claim ownership and control over agriculture. Thus, the poor and hungry people have a moral right to claim control over agriculture technology and resources of land and nature for production of food. Those who destroy this potential has no right to claim control and ownership.

In Sri Lanka

In Sri Lanka the need for this transformation of agriculture is very high. There are many factors related to food and agriculture in Sri Lanka that can not be effectively solved without this transformation. In summary these needs are to reduce the cost of food to the poor, reducing the present rates of malnutrition that has prevailed at unacceptably high levels for over twenty years , which damages not only the physical growth of children but the development of their brains too. A study done by the Ministry of Health, UNICEF and WHO in March 2010 showed that rate of malnutrition in the plantation children was as high as 40 %. Even in other agricultural districts it was higher than 20 %. Another serious issue that is found in relation to food in Sri Lanka is that much of the food that is available is unhealthy, chemically produced and chemically contaminated. Food marketing is entirely in the hands of private companies and artificially processed food is heavily promoted. Sri Lanka depends unnecessarily on imported food, imported seeds and imported agricultural inputs. Introduction of Commercial seeds of F-1 variety that cannot be used repeatedly is destroying the natural seed potential in the country. Unless we change this pattern Sri Lanka’s agriculture and food situation is doomed.

The potential for adopting ecological and natural farming in Sri Lanka is very high. We have enough sunlight through out the year and also enough rainfall and water. Bio diversity and food diversity in Sri Lanka is very high and can be further improved too. The fact that we still have a very large population of small holder farmers can turn out to be an advantage. This is because small farms can adopt this type of ecological farming with great efficiency. This can reduce the tremendous growth of health hazards that are caused by insufficiency of food and by unhealthy artificial food, chemically contaminated.

Although the government policies still give much priority to private sector agricultural control, the people on their own have already done much by way of small scale ecological farming. A survey conducted by MONLAR in early 2008 showed that there were around 538 organisations in the country that was promoting and practicing some form of ecological farming.

The present government has many programmes trying to address issues of rural poverty and food insecurity. They are “Api Wawamu Rata Nagamu” ( Let’s grow and build the Nation ) programme which envisages building of 4 million home gardens intending to get each of the families to have their own home garden, Another Programme is “Gama Neguma”for improving rural livelihoods and reduce rural poverty, another is Gemi Diriya ( supported by the World Bank) and so on. However, unfortunately none of these programmes have a clear vision and strategy of ecological agriculture. This failure is largely due to the heavy influence of private companies such as CIC, Prima and other companies dealing with chemical agricultural inputs and commercial food that utilizes the government to promote the type of farming that is beneficial to them to sell their inputs , seeds and technologies. What we need to do is to propagate the more effective alternatives that are very applicable and beneficial to Sri Lanka, to the farmers and also to consumers. This would be the best way of our preparing to face the future challenges of the country and also of the world.

It is time to set a new agenda of food production that allows and encourages the hungry and the poor people to take over the task of feeding themselves and also developing effective approaches that can feed the rest of the world. This approach can save the hungry from dying of hunger, the poor from extreme forms of poverty and also all others from ill health caused by unhealthy food and unhealthy environment and saving the world from environmental calamities.


Sunday, October 3, 2010

Soya farmers in trouble of selling their harvest in Sri Lanka

(October 03, 2010) As the media reported the woes of Sri Lankan soya farmers who are in difficulty of selling their bounty harvest, the government has decided to ban import of soya beans.

The company under the Ministry of Health that produces nutrient ‘Thriposha’ supplied free of charge to pregnant and breast feeding mothers of the country is to purchase the harvest of the farmers through the regional farmer companies.

The farmer companies are to purchase soya at Rs. 95 per kilo from farmer companies while the companies buy them at Rs. 85 per kilo.

The Corporative Wholesale Establishment stores at Welisala have been given to the Thriposha company to stock the soya harvest.

Meanwhile, ground reports point out that the price of a kilo of soya in open market is around Rs. 50. Some companies that signed forward trade agreements with farmers to purchase soya at prices above Rs. 80 per kilo have also resorted to break the agreements through scrupulous ways to purchase soya from open market.

This phenomenon is repeated in  Lanka as the agricultural authorities have no plans to manage the harvests properly.

Farmers say that in number of occasions, markets flooded with imported agricultural commodities like big onion, potato and maze etc. just before the harvests were reaped by local farmers.


Thursday, September 23, 2010

Statistics of extreme poverty in Sri Lanka's Western Province

(September 24, 2010) Sri Lanka’s Western Provincial Council has decided to increase the poverty concession to Rs. 1000 per month since 2011.

Now, the extremely poor people of the Western Province are paid Rs. 350, an amount less than three US dollars per month.

The poverty concession per a person per month is Rs. 150, just above one dollar per month and the maximum paid for a family so far is Rs. 350.

There were 72,028 recipients of this poverty concession in 2009, according to Western Provincial Council statistics.

Announcing the budget of the Western Provincial Council for 2011, Chief Minister Prasanna Ranathunga said yesterday that the council would spend Rs. 576.5 million for poverty concession.





Monday, September 6, 2010

Sri Lanka to adopt Indian method to store paddy

(September 06, 2010) Sri Lanka has adopted Indian method of storing paddy outdoors. It was first put into practice at the Walpita Paddy Storage Complex in Divulapitiya on Friday (September 3) with the participation of the Minister of Co-operatives and Internal Trade Johnston Fernando.

Minister Fernando told The Island that six Indian experts were in the country to assist in storing paddy. The paddy loaded in gunny bags/sacks could be stored on a wooden platform on stilts and covered by thick polythene. That way, experts say, paddy could be kept in good condition for twelve to eighteen months.

The Minister said that the excess paddy from the Polonnaruwa District had been stored at the Walpita Storage Complex in keeping with the Indian method.

Sri Lanka was now self sufficient in paddy said Minister Johnston Fernando adding that according to estimates by the Agriculture Department the paddy harvest was about 1.5 million MT. It was problematic to purchase and store so much of paddy but the Indian method would be of great help.

Minister Fernando said that purchasing paddy from farmers would not be a problem in the future and the Indian method would be adopted in Polonnaruwa, Anuradhapura and Ampara districts from today (September 6).

-Lal Gunasekara (The Island)


Friday, August 27, 2010

Politics behind Sri Lanka paddy crisis

(August 27, 2010) Sri Lanka’s major opposition United National Party (UNP) Anuradhapura district MP P. Harrison charges that the farmers cannot afford a fair price for their rice harvest as a result of short-sighted policies of the government.

The MP pointed out that the government that was ahead of elections imported 122,330 metric tons of rice from January to May 2010. He also highlighted that 30,000 metric tons out of these rice stocks are still in markets.

The government accuses the UNP for selling 61 of the 378 paddy stores of the Paddy Marketing Board to the private sector. But MP P. Harrison said that some of the businessmen that purchased these building are politicians of the present government.

He also pointed out that the Act of Termination of Paddy Marketing Board was tabled in the parliament in 2000 by the present Prime Minister D.M. Jayarathna.

The farmers in the major paddy cultivating districts of Sri Lanka lament that they are unable to find a fair price for the harvest of the Yala season. Yala is not the major harvesting season and farmers faced less difficulty in other Yala seasons to sell their produce.


Thursday, August 19, 2010

Ray Wijewardane: a scientist and a simple man

(August 19, 2010) Vidyajothi Dr. Ray Wijewardane was one of the top most scientists in Sri Lanka. His contributions are well known in the country and in the rest of the world. He is the person who first designed the land master hand tractor. One of his most favorite efforts was with aircrafts. He is known to have attempted to build his own aircraft and fly it himself, when he was only a young college student studying at St. Thomas's College, Mt. Lavinia. His first attempt failed and he crashed down flying only a very short distance. He says that he was given a public punishment for this attempt by the principal of the school and the reason given for punishment was not because he tried to fly but because he did not do the job properly. Later he continued his ambition in his life studying aircraft engineering in foreign universities and also had practical training in building aircrafts,

working in such factories. Later he built several aircrafts and flew them himself successfully. Once he was flying his aircraft from some country and landed in India. He had run out of fuel and did not have money to refuel it. So, he sold his aircraft and found money to return home.

We have very great respect and regard for him, not only for his tremendous contributions in science, but also because of the fact that he spent his scientific life to serve society in a positive manner. His father advised him that aircrafts is not an effective way of finding a living, he may continue it as his ambition but to do something
else as his way of living. He then studied agriculture and specialized in it, becoming an expert agronomist. He practiced his agriculture on his own and he had a principle that he will not advise anyone to do anything before trying it out himself. He believed that farmers do not trust any advice unless they see the adviser living by what he preaches.

One of his greatest efforts, as far as we know, is in the development of Dendro Power. The problem of generating enough power for uses in Sri Lanka is a big challenge the country has been facing for quite some time. We have reached almost the maximum potential in hydro power and we have been looking for other sources of power for quite some time. Dr. Ray Wijewardana has been working on this issue with a few other
scientists for several years. They are of the view that Dendro is one of the most effective ways of solving the issue of power generation.

Dr. Ray Wijewardane worked out these benefits and potential and argued that Dendro is not only a source of power and energy but is a valuable source of improving soil fertility and agriculture. This added advantage has now become very beneficial since chemical fertilizer has become not only very expensive but also has begun to cause very serious health problems such as kidney diseases.

Pollution of water, soil, food and environment have become massive problems that are destroying soil fertility and availability of healthy food at affordable cost. Discovering these tremendous advantages of gliricidia growing in recovery of fertile land and improvement of agriculture in the country Dr. Ray Wijewardane and others started working on this approach not only from a power generation point of view but also on an approach of environment and agriculture improvement.

He amply demonstrated the viability of this approach with the experiments he carried out in his coconut plantation, the Kohombe Estate. On this estate of 150 acres of coconut he has succeeded in utilizing no external fertilizer other than the Gliricidia and Tithonia (“Wal Suriyakantha”) plants that has been grown in the estate itself. Also using the twigs taken from the Gliricidia plants he produced his own power in the estate to do all the lighting in the several houses and to do all other work that requires power such as water pumping,
running the coconut husking machine. There has been an ongoing dialogue with the government and the electricity Board to accept this approach as our alternative approach to power generation.

We consider this to be one of his most valuable contributions since adopting coal power as the solution to our power needs would mean that within the next ten years or so, we will have to spend more than the total added income from exporting tea, rubber and coconut to import the coal that is required. These figures have been worked out and shown by these scientists. This is in addition to the tremendous damage caused to
environment in utilizing coal power which is one of the worst pollutants.

In spite of all this work done by scientists such as Dr. Ray Wijewardane, the Government has not looked at this option sufficiently seriously. He did not use his science to earn money, but he spent the money that he earned for further advancement of science and the well-being of humans. One way in which the tremendous contributions made to society by Dr. Ray Wijewardane and the group of scientists could be appreciated would be by committing ourselves to fighting on to bring their battles to victory.
-MONLAR


Sunday, August 15, 2010

Rice prices expected to soar

By Saliya Kumara Gunasekara, LakbimaNews

(15 July 2010) Rice cultivators are facing a dilemma as the government has not implemented a proper plan to purchase surplus paddy after the Yala harvest. As a result a farmer was forced to burn his produce last week. Meanwhile, in another incident there was an attempt by a farmer in the Ampara district to set a sack of paddy on fire while simultaneously setting himself on fire.

The government is accusing the UNP of motivating the farmer to self immolate. “ We investigated the Ampara issue and found that a powerful figure in the UNP was behind it. The UNP is playing games with the lives of the people. They are pursuing power. We haven’t stopped purchasing rice, though our stores are full. If the stores in the Paddy Marketing Board (PMB) and the food department won’t do, we will take steps to get a few stores from the private sector,” Minister of Co-operatives and Internal Trade, Johnston Fernando said.

Beyond expectations

Meanwhile, even though the estimated rice production was between 1.36 to 1.40 million metric tonnes this year, it went beyond expectations as paddy production in the Northern and Eastern provinces was extremely good. But the authorities do not have a plan to purchase paddy in the event of a large supply, as rice prices are expected to soar.

Although the PMB has not yet begun to purchase paddy, Minister Johnston Fernando says that 1995 million kilograms of rice has already been purchased by the Board and that “80 percent of the stocks have already been stored. “However, it has been found that due to insufficient storing capacity at the PMB, even 5% of the total paddy production of the Yala season has not been stored.’’

Meanwhile, the PMB says that Nadu and Samba rice will be bought at the floor price of 28 and 30 rupees respectively. At present private rice merchants pay 20 rupees per kilogram. This racket is carried on in the Polonnaruwa district. As far as the farmer is concerned, he has to bring the produce to the PMB in order to sell it. Since transport costs are high and there are no PMBs in villages, farmers make no profit by selling the produce to the government. However, private merchants go to the farmer to purchase the harvest and in the end farmers sell their produce to the private trader. Farmers charge that the government has failed to create a proper mechanism to carry out this task.

Responding to the PMB’s inability to purchase paddy from farmers, Minister Johnston Fernando says that “ the PMB has no facilities to go to the farmer and purchase paddy. Initially the PMB had 386 stores but now it has dwindled to a mere 136”. Farmers further charge that the remaining stores were sold during the UNP administration. The number of PMB employees has also come down. Now farmers use a machine named ‘combined harvest’ to pick the harvest. After the machine picks the harvest, farmers must dry it in the sun. Otherwise, the paddy stock will rot after it is put into sacks. It has been found that moisture in the paddy increases if it is stored in sacks immediately after using the machine.

However, farmers in the Ampara district charge that the PMB still doesn’t purchase paddy from the Ampara District. Generally,the country faces a rice shortage in November, December and January as mill owners hide stocks with the intention of raising rice prices. However, Minister Johnston Fernando assured that this time around he will not permit such a situation to occur.


Sunday, August 8, 2010

No programme to purchase paddy; Price declines worry the farmers in Sri Lanka

(August 08, 2010) The farmers in Sri Lanka’s major rice cultivation districts complain that the lack of proper programme of the government to purchase paddy has caused sharp decline in purchasing prices at Yala season. They also point out that the hyped state programme for purchasing paddy is a sham.

The farmers point out that the price of a kilo of Nadu rice is between Rs. 15 and 17 while the government registered price is Rs. 28 per kilo.

The price of a kilo of Samba rice is Rs. 18 and 20 while the government registered price is Rs. 30 per kilo, farmers of Polonnaruwa say.

The private traders have taken advantage of the inefficiency of the Paddy Marketing Board to bring down the prices.

Meanwhile the Chairman of the Paddy Marketing Board K.B. Jayasinghe said that the paddy stores in Polonnaruwa district is still stocked with the harvest of the last season and steps have been taken to shift them to food stores in Veyangoda and Divulapitiya in the Western Province.



Tuesday, August 3, 2010

World Bank's Leaked Report on Land Grabs Contradicts its Advice to the Developing Countries

August 2, 2010. Oakland (CA): Recently leaked draft report from the World Bank, The Global Land Rush: Can it Yield Sustainable and Equitable Benefits, challenges the publicly held position of the World Bank on investments in agricultural lands in poor nations - a trend that has come to be popularly known as land grabbing. Although such investments have been hailed by the World Bank as a way to generate jobs and infrastructure, the report states, "investors are targeting countries with weak laws, buying arable land on the cheap, and failing to deliver on promises of jobs and investments," and in some cases inflict serious damage on the local resource base.

"Conclusions of the leaked report confirm those of(Mis)Investment in Agriculture: The Role of the International Finance Corporation in the Global Land Grab, a report released by the Oakland Institute in April this year. They pose a challenge to the World Bank whose policy prescriptions, up to now, have contented that the land deals reflect a potential win-win situation for both investors and developing countries," said Anuradha Mittal, director of the Oakland Institute. "This calls for heightened scrutiny of the Bank's activities in promoting investor-friendly policies that spur foreign direct investment in agriculture in poor countries, and holding it accountable instead of allowing it to sweep the damning findings under the rug," she continued.

In April, as the World Bank and UN agencies released a discussion note entitled "Principles for Responsible Agricultural Investment that respects rights, livelihoods and resources," the Oakland Institute released (Mis)Investment in Agriculture, exposing the role of the Bank's private sector branch, the International Finance Corporation (IFC), in fueling land grabs, especially in Africa.

"The Bank's report is certainly a surprising turn of events given that the International Finance Corporation (IFC) has not only legitimized the land grab trend but effectively facilitated and promoted it," said Shepard Daniel, Fellow at the Oakland Institute and co-author of the(Mis)Investment report. "The report's conclusions that land deals are dangerous, lack transparency, and rarely seek to incorporate the host countries' overall investment strategies reflect our findings. The key question is how this acknowledgment will be integrated into the work of the Bank's agencies like the IFC, which have increased the ability of foreign investors to acquire land in developing country markets," she continued.

Following the publication of its reports, The Great Land Grab: Rush for World's Farmland Threatens Food Security for the Poor (2009) and (Mis)Investment in Agriculture: The Role of the International Finance Corporation in the Global Land Grab (2010), the Oakland Institute is continuing to examine and document land deals in an effort to expose their impact and how this trend impedes the urgent and critical task of improving food security for the world's most vulnerable.

Click Here to download a copy of (Mis)Investment in Agriculture  (http://www.oaklandinstitute.org/pdfs/misinvestment_web.pdf).

Click Here to download a copy of The Great Land Grab. (www.oaklandinstitute.org/pdfs/LandGrab_final_web.pdf)



Friday, July 23, 2010

MONLAR initiates Zero budget farming in Vanni

MONLAR made an initial visit to the Northern region of Sri Lanka to find out the possibilities of helping the war affected and recently resettled people in Vanni, trying to negotiate their way forward through the rubble of what's left of their lives. To restart their livelihoods based mainly on agriculture which is also the main livelihood practice of the major part of the community there.

Jeyapurm, some 40 kilometers south west from Killinochchi in the Vanni region was a strong hold of LTTE before it all came to an end in a heap of destruction, the end result of the 30 year long war in Sri Lanka. The ill-famed 'Black July' of 1983 (the mass exodus of ethnic Tamils in the face of death & destruction at the hands of state sponsored terrorism coupled with Sinhala nationalism) forced Tamil nationals in large numbers from the south of Sri Lanka to migrate and settle in Jayapurum and other areas in the North for their survival. The animosity brew into boiling point and the rest is now history, or history in the making.

"All at once Sri Lanka government and Tigers started a fearsome war. We the people in between had to bear the consequences all the time. When they start fighting we run away in to the jungle and hide. Each house in the village had a bunker that gave safety from aerial bombing and shelling. During this period we had to live in camps for many occasions. Our children feared to live in the village and they went off to Jaffna for studies and even today they do not like to come back "says Shanthie, thinking through the past.

"Then our only concern was trying to be alive and protecting our children. We had to forget about all other matters. The agriculture and animal husbandry that we used to do was very successful and we were quite self sufficient. But when they started the last pace of the war two years ago, we had to move from our houses with all our belongings. We took our cows, goats, bulls and carts with us. Through the war, nearing the end, we had to leave them all behind and run for life, coming back with only a small bag of clothes through the battle zone. But many died. Some of our relatives and family members could not make it….. Then, we were in a refugee camp for a year. Finally, we returned home losing everything and only then we got to see that our houses were all destroyed and in some houses only parts of walls were standing." says Vishvanathan, who was instrumental in organizing the villages for the encounter.

"Now we don’t have any means of livelihood. We have to start all from the beginning. Food rations also have stopped now. It is very hard to find food. Food items are very expensive in the shops, how can we afford to buy them? We barely survived the war; surely, we do not want to die by starvation. Therefore, we want to start farming and animal husbandry again. Seeds, fertilizer and other agricultural equipments are at high price now, because of the demand. It's unbearable, how market people try to make profit of our dire situation. I don't know…., we just have to find other means to start and do farming without money in our hands." adds Ramachandran, an dedicated farmer himself.

Living testimony, Compelling truth! A most important of situations where the response of MONLAR should speak for its mandate, since MONLAR believes that the practice of Ecological Farming is best appropriated with the marginalized communities thrown out to destitution through either the exploitative market mechanisms or the false solutions of governments.

Therefore, the war ravaged community of Jeyapuram deserved the best of our services and more of our resources in uplifting their lives through livelihood development. As we were able to gather through earnest conversation with the villagers, it was easy to recognize that it is only timely and most appropriate to help the farmer households to begin sustainable and ecological agriculture in their land plots. The participants who attended the meeting readily understood the fact that they would have to help rebuild the regenerative capacity of their land in order to rebuild their livelihoods. The war destroyed what they had built on their lands; but the gradual decline of the fertility of their soil had been of their own doings.

Thus, the participants were introduced to the novel concept of 'Zero-Budget Natural Farming' which MONLAR had adopted as the most comprehensive method of farming that suits best for the conditions of the Vanni. With no capital or other inputs required, while making best use of the freely available natural resources that Vanni has to offer, the farmers of Jeyapuram were taken through the first steps of a long process leading to food sovereignty.

Linus Jayatilake, a veteran farmer and a renowned civil activist working with MONLAR lead the team to Vanni in this vital initiative. In his observations, he says "Even before the people resettled in Vanni, and before they were able to take a mental rest from the effects of a devastating war, and even before they started to think of restarting their farming efforts - the agribusiness companies with their loadings of chemicals, fertilizers and sophisticated machinery hand in hand with their financier companies from south have rushed to the North complete with their all too familiar ruthless advertising campaigns. Already they have put-up their sales outlets in many areas. They are already expending millions of rupees to hang-up their advertising billboards along the road sides at regular intervals. They actually are not concerned about the people, but only about their own profits. So, as concerned people, we must take immediate steps to protect the poor and helpless farmers in these areas by introducing them better and cheaper ways of getting back to their own agricultural practices to rebuild their lives and livelihoods. People here suffered unnecessarily from a brutal war for nearly 30 years. That is more than enough for them. We do not want them to suffer from another worst disaster once again."

After explaining the basics of the concept of 'Zero-budget Natural Farming', a training session on the methodology of preparing "Jeewamurtha" (Type of a micro organism stimulant made out of 'desheeya' cow dong and urine) was held at the Jeyapuram School premises with the participation of farmers of the village. Some indigenous vegetable seed verities were also distributed among farmers. The enthusiastic participants were thrilled to learn about the 'no input' farming system and vowed to kick-start the process and continue with it. The farmers were deeply appreciative of the precious opportunity given and the interaction of the group from the south. They all requested the group for a second visit, ideally, just before the maha season promising to organize another meeting with a much larger participation of farmers in the area.

"It is clear that the people here are in a desperate situation. It is our duty and will to lend our hands for them to stand-up on their own feet. Hence, this is only the beginning of a long journey. We of MONLAR pledge to honor our partnership in taking this initiative forward" Lakpriya, the coordinator of the program on behalf of MONLAR, said in conclusion.

By Shamila Rathnasooriya
Mobile Media Unit
MONLAR

11Th July 2010




Paddy production, rice and wheat flour imports; boasting and reality | වී නිෂ්පාදනය, සහල් හා පිටි ආනයන; පම්පෝරි හා ඇත්ත




Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Favorites More