Thursday, December 16, 2010

Coconut; once major export, now imported

(December 16, 2010) Sri Lanka government has decided to import cocnut to eradicate the shortage and the escalation of prices.

Sri Lanka Ministry of Consumer Affairs is now taking measures to import coconut, sources say.

The import is to be done by next week. The amounts of import is yet to be known.

The price of cocnut has risen sharply in Sri Lanka and a nut is sold atound Rs. 45 now. Coconut is a basic commodity of Sri Lankans that use the coconut juice in cooking curry.

Meanwhile, the Coconut Development Board has taken measures to purchase coconut from state tands and to sell them at fair price. Coconut Development Board trucks sell coconut at Rs. 30 per nut at selected places and one person is allowed to buy five nuts each.


Saturday, December 11, 2010

Rice price escalating; buffer stocks processed

(December 11, 2010) Sri Lanka government says that the cabinet has granted approval to release 70,000 metric tons of rice from the government paddy stores to the market during the upcoming festive season.

The aim of this measure is to prevent the escalation of the price of the Sri Lankans' major staple food.
Treasury will release Rs. 430 million for processing paddy.

The rice of these buffer stocks will be sold by the Corporative Wholesale Establishment and Cooperative Society department stores.


Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Mahaweli land to businessmen while young generation lack land for farming

(December 08, 2010) Sri Lanka Minister of Irrigation and Water Management Nimal Siripala de Silva said that the land of Sri Lanka's Mahaweli development zones would be offered to the local entrepreneurs as and incentive.

The Minister said to local radio channel Hiru FM that 50 acres each would be allocated to 250 selected local businessmen.

The land is to be allocated to the businessmen for agricultural, animal husbandry and industrial projects, said the Minister.

The farmers suspect that this can be a move to offer valuable farmlands to businessman close to the government while the young generations of the Mahaweli colonizers face a severe problem of scarcity of land for farming.


Friday, December 3, 2010

A national summit on paddy development held in Sri Lanka

(December 02, 2010) A national summit on paddy development was held on December 02 at the Plants and Genetic Resources Centre in Gannoruwa in Kandy district.

The conference was held under the patronage of Minister of Agriculture Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena. Experts in the cultivation sector and top officials are taking part at the event together with a number of foreign representatives.

The participants reportedly focussed on identifying high yield verities of paddy, launch of eco friendly cultivation and many other issues related to paddy cultivation during the conference.

Meanwhile, the department of agriculture says 1.05 million hectares of paddy lands have been cultivated this year.


Saturday, November 13, 2010

Restoration of GSP+ urgently needed to sustain EU apparel market

 


article_image
The European Union withdrew the GSP+ tariff concession granted to Sri Lanka under special privileges to economically vulnerable developing countries since 2005, on 15 th August, 2010 in relation to what was regarded as shortcomings in Sri Lanka record on implementation of 27 International Conventions which is an integral part of the trade benefit.

The last nail to the coffin seems to have been driven when Mr.Bernard Savage, EU Ambassador in Colombo has stated recently that the Government and the EU are not involved in fresh talks to revive the GSP plus trade benefits for the country. He has categorically stated that the government had not made any approach to resume negotiations on the issue and so the matter was now closed. (Source – The Island – 09th November 2010)

During the recent past, one of the most crucial trade concession Sri Lanka received was the granting of GSP+ status in the EU market, following the "Tsunami" of 26th, December, 2004. This provided duty-free access for 7200 items and the most beneficiary of the concession is the Apparel sector. Few countries provide such an attractive Import Duty concession except under a Free- Trade-Agreement. (FTA)

Garments industry was promoted as an engine of development in Sri Lanka. It certainly brings dollars.

This provision of duty free access to EUmarket is regarded as having facilitated substantial growth in the country’s exports and especially apparel, in the region since its implementation in year 2005.

Major impact

Apparel exports alone to the WU, climbed from US$997 million in 2004 - the year before Sri Lanka was granted GSP+ benefits- to US$ 1,647 million in 2009 an increase of 65.2 percent and thus EUbecame the top market for Sri Lanka’s apparels in 2009 replacing the United States who had been the top market since the inception of the apparel industry in early 1980’s.

Its export share which was 37.6% in 2004 also climbed to 52.9% in 2009. It is widely accepted that the withdrawal of GSP+ will have a major impact on the apparel industry. The fear is that the growing number of European buyers will find Sri Lanka’s apparel increasingly uncompetitive and shift their sourcing to rival producers.

The details of Sri Lanka’s Garment exports to the EU are as follows-

The above table also indicates that due to the EU- GSP+ concession, total apparel exports also gradually increased year after year, except for year 2009, where the entire global apparel industry was affected due to a world-wide economic recession.

During 2009-with Sri Lanka while enjoying EU-GSP+ concessions, was the 8th Leading exporter to EU Market. China topped with US$ 38,057 mn, followed by Turkey-US$ 9,967,mn, Bangladesh-US$ 7,126 mn, India-US$ 6,316 mn, Tunisia-US$ 3,185 mn, Morocco-US$ 2,813 mn, Vietnam- US$ 1,752 mn and Sri Lanka-US$ 1,687 mn and closely followed by Indonesia US$ 1,603 mn and Pakistan US$ 1,568 mn. Now with Sri Lanka not enjoying the GSP+ concession with effect from 15th August, 2010, Sri Lanka obviously will be at a disadvantage.

Further Pakistan which was behind Sri Lanka will probably receive the GSP+ in 2011 to 2013, will also be a threat to Sri Lanka. The above countries are the main competitors of Sri Lanka in the global apparel market.

(Source-World Trade Organization-WTO)

The country thus stands to lose millions of dollars worth of apparel exports to the 27 –nations EU market and the livelihood of thousands of apparel sector workers are at stake, as the withdrawal of the privileges is expected to affect large number of factories.

According to Industrialists, the loss of the GSP+ benefit will exert tight pressure of profit margin, for when the benefits are lost, sellers will have to bear the cost of additional tariff. Under the GSP+ concessions Sri Lankan goods entering the EU need to pay no duty; but now the privilege is lost and the standard GSP kicked in and thus Sri Lankan apparel became subject to concession of only 2-2.4% duty which is 20% of standard tariff averaging 10-12% as against zero duty which enjoyed prior to withdrawal of GSP+ in 15th, August, 2010.

Decline in Exports

Meanwhile, despite Sri Lanka enjoying the GSP+ privileges in the EU, Sri Lanka’s Apparel exports to EU market contracted by 8.4% during the first eight months of current year from the year ago level. The apparel exports to EU during Jan/August, 2010 was US$ 986 million as against US$ 1,077 million during same period 2009. The European Commission (EC) announcement of 15th February, 2010 of it’s intention to suspend the GSP+ concession granted to Sri Lanka with effect from 15 th August,2010 would have also have affected for above decline in exports.

The Chairman of the Joint Apparel Association Forum, Mr.Sukumaran has said recently that it is most likely that the apparel exports, which is Sri Lanka’s key industrial exports, would come down by 10-15 percent this year, reaching US$2.7-2.8 billion, as compared to last year.

(Source - Fibre2Fashion News Desk – India)

Further according to Mr.Rohan Masakorale Secretary General - Joint Apparel Association Forum around 250 factories may get affected due to this withdrawal.

Sri Lanka’s second largest apparel export market is United States. In this market also it is seen the exports are gradually declining. The details are as follows-

It is seen from the above table the apparel exports to USA has declined by from US$1,556 million in 2004 to US$ 1,297 million in 2009, which is a drop of 16.6 %.The share also has dropped to 41.6% in 2009 from 58.7% in 2004.

The apparel exports to USA market during first eight months of 2010 declined by 4.6% over the same period year ago. The exports during the period Jan/August, 2010 was US$833 million as against US$ 873 million during Jan/August, 2009.

The major global market for apparel imports right throughout are EU and USA. In 2009, EU (US$ 160 billion) and USA (US$ 72 billion) totaling US$232 billion and these two markets accounted for 73% of global total apparel imports.

Similarly Sri Lanka’s two major apparel export markets are EU (US$ 1,65 billion) and USA (US$1.3 billion) and both these markets accounted for 94.5% of total apparel exports in 2009.

Cheaper Sources

In today’s market place, it has become a norm to source clothing from countries with low costs. Furthermore the buyers are being forced to look for cheaper sources in order to satisfy consumers who are increasingly demanding, while competition in the retail level continue to get tougher. However, there is still a gap in the market for manufacturers based in Western Europe and the United States who produce goods in their own country for sale in the domestic market and for export.

Of course, production costs are usually much higher in developed countries. Indeed labor costs alone in Western Europe can be over many times as high as those in Asian countries, Nonetheless, manufacturing in developed countries bring in number of benefits. One benefit is flexibility in being able to offer smaller production runs and short delivery times. While distant suppliers may be cheaper, buyers often demand minimum quantities which can be economically not possible. Furthermore, the buyers are looking increasingly to source from factories which adhere to Corporate Social Responsibility –CSR programmes in general-and fair labor practices in particular. Our "Garments Without Guilt" is well known both locally and internationally as superior garments.

Future Looks Bleak

On the employment side-media reports quoted that the future looks bleak and fears of retrenchment are worrying the workers, but the figures can rise with the withdrawal.

Thus causing loss of job opportunities in the apparel industry it will also no doubt affect the inflow of foreign currency from export earnings. Sri Lanka has gained a reputation of exporting top brands to leading buyers in the world but will soon lose that status if we don’t regain the GSP +.

International Textile Manufacturing Federation-ITMF, at its annual meeting in Brazil expressed its concern about the soaring cotton prices and their negative implications for the international cotton textile value chain from fibre to retail. The ITMF stated that the textile industry all over the world is not in a position to absorb any longer cotton price increases of unprecedented dimensions recorded during the past months without risking its own existence.

(ITMF-Press Release-8th

Further in addition to above stated facts, increases in prices of cotton, freight cost, currency fluctuation and competition from other countries with GSP+ with all this taking place in the global apparel industry and with an additional payment of 9.6% to 12% duty on Sri Lankan products makes Sri Lanka extremely expensive compared to our competitors.

Any decline in apparel exports will also affect the Local Textile Industry as obviously requirements from apparel industry will be gradually reduced.

The EU Ambassador Mr. Bernard Savage’s recent statement that the government and the European Union (EU) are not involved in fresh talks to revive the GSP plus trade benefits for the country, no doubt comes as a fresh blow to a dying industry thus intensifying the shock.

The EU this year decided to suspend Sri Lanka’s preferential trade status over allegations of human rights violations.

The EU said that Sri Lanka had not demonstrated that it had taken the steps that would allow it to retain or regain the GSP+ status.

(Source – The Island – 09th November 2010)

Therefore taking above facts into consideration, if the GSP+ status is not restored in the near future, the Sri Lanka’s apparel industry which is the major foreign exchange earner of the country for many decades may have to face bad times with decline in exports and employment opportunities.

Therefore the outcome will not be good for the economy of the country and thus the Government and the EU should pursue its dialogue without any further delay and both arrive at a win-win situation and ensure the restoration of the GSP+ at the earliest. If not one could imagine what would befall our Garment industry and its workers.


Monday, November 1, 2010

Sri Lanka government relaxes import duty on potato and big onion

(November 01, 2010) Secretary of the Ministry of Cooperatives and Internal Trade Anura Siriwardhana announced that the government has relaxed the import duty for potato and big onion.

Accordingly, the import tax for potato has been reduced to Rs. 10 per kilo from Rs. 30 per kilo earlier.

The import tax for big onion has also been reduced from Rs. 25 kilo earlier to Rs. 10 per kilo.

The government says the import taxes were imposed to sustain prices during the prices during the harvesting period of the local potato and big onion farmers.

The measure curbed the influx of imported cheap potato and big onion in the local market.

However, the importers of these commodities say that the market prices will not go down since the prices of potato and big onion have gone up in India.


Saturday, October 23, 2010

Gannoruwa introduces new tomato variety

(October 23, 2010) Horticultural Crop Research and Development Institute, Gannoruwa, Sri Lanka announced the introduction of new tomato variety suitable for the island.

The new tomato variety was introduced under project thrust Tomato varietal development via mutation breeding, according to the website of the institute.

Senior Research Officer Ranjani Peiris said to media that the new tomato variety named as ‘Lanka Cherry’ is smaller in size and the weight of a fruit is around eight grams.

She said that one hectare of the cultivation of Lanka Cherry would give as much as 17 tons crop.
The harvest can be kept at normal temperature without rotting for 10 to 18 days.



Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Anomalies in distribution of subsidized fertilizer by government of Sri Lanka

(October 20, 2010) Movement for National Land and Agricultural Reforms (MONLAR) of Sri Lanka urges the government to rectify the administrative errors of distribution of fertilizer to the rice farmers under the government subsidy.

The government spends Rs. 28 billion per annum for the fertilizer subsidy of the rice farmers to supply fertilizer at 4% of the actual market price. However, the farmers point out that some of the farmer organizations that are responsible of distribution of fertilizer engage malpractices.

Farmers complain that the farmer organizations add high transport costs to the 50 kilogram fertilizer bag and sell them well over Rs. 50 to the government subsidized price of Rs. 350.

Another issue highlighted is the lack of proper method to measure small amounts less than 10 kilograms that should be given to farmers according to the size of the land of the farmers. The farmers allege that these amounts of fertilizer that is spared from the farmers add into a huge stock finally that is swindled by the unscrupulous officials.

The farmers charge that the officials of the Peasants Service Centers are also meddled with corrupt deals of the farmer organizations.



Monday, October 18, 2010

It’s time to allow the hungry to feed themselves and the rest of the World

(October 17, 2010) The world is commemorating the WFD ( Oct.16 ) this year in a state where the food situation in the world is precarious . The lessons we have to learn from the experiences in trying to feed the world are very important. This is not because of the successes but because of the failures. The world leaders have almost come to a situation in which they need to admit that their efforts so far in trying to solve world’s hunger has failed and they are not in a position to find effective solutions.

In the year 2000, the world leaders met and decided to set up the Millennium Development Goals ( MDGs), when they promised that they would reduce world’s hunger by half by year 2015. There were 840 million people then, who were going to bed hungry every day. They should then have realized that all these 840 million people would be dead when they reached this target. But they went ahead. Now the number of people who were hungry have not reduced although two thirds of the target period has elapsed, but it has increased to 1.2 billion. The discussions that were held at the world conference on Food Security convened by FAO to see what could be done by the year 2050, when the situation becomes much more serious, ended up in not working out any effective strategy.

So, the task of the people on food and on the Food Day should be to emphasize that the present leaders of the world are unable to find solutions to the problem of hunger. Some other strategy and some other agencies must undertake to find solutions to the problem of hunger. The world fails to solve hunger not because the world does not produce enough to feed all, not because the technical capacity to produce enough food is lacking. It is simply because food is produced not mainly to solve hunger but to make profits. The entire activity of food production, processing and marketing is largely dominated by big companies ( TNCs ) who are more concerned in making greater profits rather than feeding the hungry. Much of the land and other natural resources that are necessary to produce food are in the hands of big companies, they also have a strong control over seeds and inputs and also technologies utilized to produce food. The process of land grabbing by the rich has got more intensified.

The recent crisis of price increases of food was caused due to food being used for production of bio fuels, more meat production leading to much food being produced to feed animals rather than to feed people and also due to large migration into cities making the populations in the cities compared with rural areas reaching 50 : 50. Another factor that is affecting food production is global warming resulting in climate change leading to lower yields. If you examine each of these reasons they are due to food production being controlled by profit motivated producers. The reasons for failure of world leaders to find effective solutions are due to the fact that they do not want to change this situation of allowing the big profit makers to have control and ownership over food production, seeds,marketing and food producing resources of the world.

This situation can be changed only by taking over the task of feeding the hungry away from these profit making controllers into the hands of those who are genuinely interested in solving hunger. Who are they ? They are the hungry people of the world. How can they do it ? If they do not have the capital presently needed to produce food, they have to think of strategies that do not depend on financial capital. Can the world think of a strategy that does not depend on financial capital to produce its food ?

In solving this issue it is necessary to recognize that the type of agriculture that is prevalent today is very heavily input dependent. The ecological impacts of such external input dependent agriculture has been found to be drastic and very damaging. World scale studies that have been done recently such as the IAASTED ( International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development) completed in April 2008 showed that the present day prevalent agriculture, though capable of producing much food and much diversity of food has committed two serious mistakes in ignoring the social aspects of agriculture and also the environmental aspects of it. This was a very important research that was done by 400 prominent scientists, commissioned by world’s leading institutions, who studied this in a large number of countries, over a period of four years and it was finally accepted by nearly 60 countries of the world. There is an alternative approach advocated by very large farmers movements such as Via Campasena ( world peasants movement ) and very large movements of small and landless farmers such as MST in Brazil who are promoting small scale ecological agriculture by small farmers as a more effective way of solving the problem of hunger.

The major difference in this approach is to make use of nature’s advantages such as maximizing the use of sunlight, maximizing bio diversity, improving the soil fertility by preventing erosion, by maximizing the benefits of microbial activity by adopting techniques that maximize the presence of microbes in the soil and also utilizing methods of integrated pest management instead of chemical pest control, chemical weed control and use of chemical fertilizer etc. Utilizing mixed farming rather than monocropping is another technique. This approach is fast growing in many countries in spite of the massive propaganda by agribusiness TNCs to continue their previous techniques that only bring profits to the larger operators at the cost of making a lot of farmers poorer and also destroying their livelihoods while making more and more people hungry. Introductionn of genetic modifications etc. have been done not so much due to their effectiveness in sustainability of agriculture but for the possibilities of maximizing profits in the hands of big companies.

We have been able to contact some practices that are developed in India by people such as Mr. Subash Pallekar who has done many years of research in developing the technique that he describes as “ Zero Budget Natural Farming”. This strategy is now being adopted by around 4 million farmers in India.

It is a simple technique that utilizes the basic principle that farming is done free of charge by nature. The technique utilizes only a simple formula named “jeevamurtha” a mixture of deshi cow dung, cow urine, some sweetener such as juggery or coconut water and some powdered cereal and a handful of soil from the neighborhood that contains microbes that are present in the said environment. A similar mixture named beejamurtha is utilized to prepare seeds for germination. What is important is that this application requires no financial input and it utilizes natural farming totally. These mixtures require only two days of fermentation to be ready for application and the result are immediate.

On the whole what is important in feeding the hungry is to allow the people who are threatened with hunger to develop their own techniques of finding their food by going back to nature and benefits of natural farming. What is necessary is to remove the policy obstacles that are existing against this strategy. Already much has been achieved by way of techniques of natural farming. Sometimes these techniques are called organic farming, or ecological farming, it can also be named regenerative agriculture since the proper techniques of natural farming will also help in restoring the ability of nature to regenerate itself.

Restoring the capacity of nature to regenerate itself is a need for survival of all human beings and all other life forms. From this point of view, this restoration of agriculture back into its natural process of regenerating nature is an essential requirement to ensure survival. This is being highlighted in the other crises such as the crisis of climate change and global warming too. Therefore these tasks that should be achieved in our techniques and policies of food production needs to be highlighted on the World Food Day. Any approach that restores the capacity of nature to regenerate itself has the moral right to claim ownership and control over agriculture. Thus, the poor and hungry people have a moral right to claim control over agriculture technology and resources of land and nature for production of food. Those who destroy this potential has no right to claim control and ownership.

In Sri Lanka

In Sri Lanka the need for this transformation of agriculture is very high. There are many factors related to food and agriculture in Sri Lanka that can not be effectively solved without this transformation. In summary these needs are to reduce the cost of food to the poor, reducing the present rates of malnutrition that has prevailed at unacceptably high levels for over twenty years , which damages not only the physical growth of children but the development of their brains too. A study done by the Ministry of Health, UNICEF and WHO in March 2010 showed that rate of malnutrition in the plantation children was as high as 40 %. Even in other agricultural districts it was higher than 20 %. Another serious issue that is found in relation to food in Sri Lanka is that much of the food that is available is unhealthy, chemically produced and chemically contaminated. Food marketing is entirely in the hands of private companies and artificially processed food is heavily promoted. Sri Lanka depends unnecessarily on imported food, imported seeds and imported agricultural inputs. Introduction of Commercial seeds of F-1 variety that cannot be used repeatedly is destroying the natural seed potential in the country. Unless we change this pattern Sri Lanka’s agriculture and food situation is doomed.

The potential for adopting ecological and natural farming in Sri Lanka is very high. We have enough sunlight through out the year and also enough rainfall and water. Bio diversity and food diversity in Sri Lanka is very high and can be further improved too. The fact that we still have a very large population of small holder farmers can turn out to be an advantage. This is because small farms can adopt this type of ecological farming with great efficiency. This can reduce the tremendous growth of health hazards that are caused by insufficiency of food and by unhealthy artificial food, chemically contaminated.

Although the government policies still give much priority to private sector agricultural control, the people on their own have already done much by way of small scale ecological farming. A survey conducted by MONLAR in early 2008 showed that there were around 538 organisations in the country that was promoting and practicing some form of ecological farming.

The present government has many programmes trying to address issues of rural poverty and food insecurity. They are “Api Wawamu Rata Nagamu” ( Let’s grow and build the Nation ) programme which envisages building of 4 million home gardens intending to get each of the families to have their own home garden, Another Programme is “Gama Neguma”for improving rural livelihoods and reduce rural poverty, another is Gemi Diriya ( supported by the World Bank) and so on. However, unfortunately none of these programmes have a clear vision and strategy of ecological agriculture. This failure is largely due to the heavy influence of private companies such as CIC, Prima and other companies dealing with chemical agricultural inputs and commercial food that utilizes the government to promote the type of farming that is beneficial to them to sell their inputs , seeds and technologies. What we need to do is to propagate the more effective alternatives that are very applicable and beneficial to Sri Lanka, to the farmers and also to consumers. This would be the best way of our preparing to face the future challenges of the country and also of the world.

It is time to set a new agenda of food production that allows and encourages the hungry and the poor people to take over the task of feeding themselves and also developing effective approaches that can feed the rest of the world. This approach can save the hungry from dying of hunger, the poor from extreme forms of poverty and also all others from ill health caused by unhealthy food and unhealthy environment and saving the world from environmental calamities.


Sunday, October 3, 2010

Soya farmers in trouble of selling their harvest in Sri Lanka

(October 03, 2010) As the media reported the woes of Sri Lankan soya farmers who are in difficulty of selling their bounty harvest, the government has decided to ban import of soya beans.

The company under the Ministry of Health that produces nutrient ‘Thriposha’ supplied free of charge to pregnant and breast feeding mothers of the country is to purchase the harvest of the farmers through the regional farmer companies.

The farmer companies are to purchase soya at Rs. 95 per kilo from farmer companies while the companies buy them at Rs. 85 per kilo.

The Corporative Wholesale Establishment stores at Welisala have been given to the Thriposha company to stock the soya harvest.

Meanwhile, ground reports point out that the price of a kilo of soya in open market is around Rs. 50. Some companies that signed forward trade agreements with farmers to purchase soya at prices above Rs. 80 per kilo have also resorted to break the agreements through scrupulous ways to purchase soya from open market.

This phenomenon is repeated in  Lanka as the agricultural authorities have no plans to manage the harvests properly.

Farmers say that in number of occasions, markets flooded with imported agricultural commodities like big onion, potato and maze etc. just before the harvests were reaped by local farmers.


Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Favorites More